Karthick vs Si of police Town ps — 142/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP090002602026

Filing Number

260/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karthick

    Adv. PARTHIBAN Y R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Si of police Town ps (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Arakkonam granted bail to Karthick (accused in Cr.No.65/2026) under Section 480 BNSS for the alleged offense under Section 303(2) BNS. The court considered that the accused had been in judicial custody since January 31, 2026, case property was recovered, and the co-accused was already released on bail, outweighing prosecution's concerns about absconding and witness tampering. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 10 days, non-tampering with evidence, and restriction on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Arakkonam granted bail to Karthick (accused in Cr.No.65/2026) under Section 480 BNSS for the alleged offense under Section 303(2) BNS. The court considered that the accused had been in judicial custody since January 31, 2026, case property was recovered, and the co-accused was already released on bail, outweighing prosecution's concerns about absconding and witness tampering. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 10 days, non-tampering with evidence, and restriction on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case