Karthikeyan vs Si of police Taluk ps — 141/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP090002592026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
259/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
141/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
101
Police Station
ARAKKONAM TALUK
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthikeyan
Adv. VETRIVEL M
Respondent(s)
Si of police Taluk ps (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 07-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Arakkonam granted bail to accused Karthikeyan, aged 52, who was charged under sections 118(1), 296(b), and 351(3) of the BNS Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering the nature of the offense, the fact that the victim was discharged, the petitioner's custody duration since 04.03.2026, and his willingness to comply with court conditions. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, police reporting for 10 days, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and restriction from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Arakkonam granted bail to accused Karthikeyan, aged 52, who was charged under sections 118(1), 296(b), and 351(3) of the BNS Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering the nature of the offense, the fact that the victim was discharged, the petitioner's custody duration since 04.03.2026, and his willingness to comply with court conditions. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, police reporting for 10 days, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and restriction from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts