SARATH vs SI OF POLICE TALUK PS Advocate - YOGALAKSHMI — 125/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP090002262026
Filing Number
226/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
ARAKKONAM TALUK
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARATH
Adv. BALAJI K
Respondent(s)
-
1.SI OF POLICE TALUK PS (Police Station) Advocate - YOGALAKSHMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Arakkonam granted bail to the 23-year-old accused Sarath in a case under Section 303(2) BNS, considering his prolonged judicial custody since February 24, 2026, and that his co-accused was already released on bail. The court imposed five conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 10 days, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, restriction on leaving India without court permission, and appearance before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
02-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
27-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 125/2026
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Arakkonam granted bail to the 23-year-old accused Sarath in a case under Section 303(2) BNS, considering his prolonged judicial custody since February 24, 2026, and that his co-accused was already released on bail. The court imposed five conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 10 days, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, restriction on leaving India without court permission, and appearance before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts