SARATH vs SI OF POLICE TALUK PS Advocate - YOGALAKSHMI — 125/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP090002262026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

226/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

125/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

ARAKKONAM TALUK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

SARATH

Adv. BALAJI K

Respondent(s)

SI OF POLICE TALUK PS (Police Station) Advocate - YOGALAKSHMI

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

09-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

Enquiry

27-02-2026

Issue of Service

25-02-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Arakkonam granted bail to the 23-year-old accused Sarath in a case under Section 303(2) BNS, considering his prolonged judicial custody since February 24, 2026, and that his co-accused was already released on bail. The court imposed five conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 10 days, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, restriction on leaving India without court permission, and appearance before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Arakkonam granted bail to the 23-year-old accused Sarath in a case under Section 303(2) BNS, considering his prolonged judicial custody since February 24, 2026, and that his co-accused was already released on bail. The court imposed five conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 10 days, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, restriction on leaving India without court permission, and appearance before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case