ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION vs KISHORKUMAR C Advocate - NARAYANAN V — 43/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRP090002222019

Evidence

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

222/2019

Filing Date

25-04-2019

Registration No

43/2019

Registration Date

25-04-2019

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

FIR Details

FIR Number

392

Police Station

AWPS, GUIDYATHAM

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 392
MP/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section KISHORKUMAR CARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION
MP/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section KISHORKUMAR CARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION
MP/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section KISHORKUMAR CARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION

Petitioner(s)

ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KISHORKUMAR C Advocate - NARAYANAN V

SATHIYA

BHARATHI

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

15-04-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

22-01-2026

Evidence

09-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

16-04-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a deposition of witness document from Arakkonam Judicial Magistrate Court (Case C.C.43/2019) recorded on April 16, 2025. Witness Santhuru (49 years old) testified that he provided a confessional statement to police in 2017, but denied supporting the accused during cross-examination by the defense. The witness's testimony was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition of witness document from Arakkonam Judicial Magistrate Court (Case C.C.43/2019) recorded on April 16, 2025. Witness Santhuru (49 years old) testified that he provided a confessional statement to police in 2017, but denied supporting the accused during cross-examination by the defense. The witness's testimony was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case