ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION vs SATHISHKUMAR D Advocate - BABU Y — 61/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,326. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRP090001752020
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
174/2020
Filing Date
29-09-2020
Registration No
61/2020
Registration Date
29-09-2020
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
FIR Details
FIR Number
843
Police Station
AWPS, GUIDYATHAM
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION
Adv. APP, YOGALAKSHMI
Respondent(s)
SATHISHKUMAR D Advocate - BABU Y
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 09-02-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 27-01-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 06-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Summary: Witness Sarath Kumar (31, welder) testified on July 1, 2024, before Judicial Magistrate No.1, Arakkonam in Criminal Case CC 61/2020 regarding a November 2019 fight incident. The witness deposed that he witnessed the accused and another person fighting near MRF Court, during which the other person was injured and bled from the head; the witness sent the injured person to hospital and noted the accused sustained no injuries. Cross-examination by the accused was not conducted as the accused declined to participate, and the deposition was recorded and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Witness Sarath Kumar (31, welder) testified on July 1, 2024, before Judicial Magistrate No.1, Arakkonam in Criminal Case CC 61/2020 regarding a November 2019 fight incident. The witness deposed that he witnessed the accused and another person fighting near MRF Court, during which the other person was injured and bled from the head; the witness sent the injured person to hospital and noted the accused sustained no injuries. Cross-examination by the accused was not conducted as the accused declined to participate, and the deposition was recorded and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts