ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION vs SHAIK ABDUL KADER M Advocate - SURESH S — 60/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),506(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRP090001742020
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
173/2020
Filing Date
29-09-2020
Registration No
60/2020
Registration Date
29-09-2020
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
FIR Details
FIR Number
289
Police Station
AWPS, GUIDYATHAM
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHAIK ABDUL KADER M Advocate - SURESH S
GUNASEKARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 09-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a deposition of witness, not a final court order. The witness (Nivedhapriydarshini, 32) testified on November 25, 2025, in case C.C.60/2020 before Arakkonam Judicial Magistrate Court regarding an alleged incident from March 2018. During examination-in-chief, the witness stated she had no current problems with the accused and was willing to have them acquitted; during cross-examination by the prosecution, she retracted parts of her police statement, denying the accused pulled her clothing or made threats. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a deposition of witness, not a final court order. The witness (Nivedhapriydarshini, 32) testified on November 25, 2025, in case C.C.60/2020 before Arakkonam Judicial Magistrate Court regarding an alleged incident from March 2018. During examination-in-chief, the witness stated she had no current problems with the accused and was willing to have them acquitted; during cross-examination by the prosecution, she retracted parts of her police statement, denying the accused pulled her clothing or made threats. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts