ARUMUGAM vs SIVASANKARAN S Advocate - SARAVANAN R — 2/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U /S27(C). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP080002432022
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
329/2022
Filing Date
21-12-2022
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
04-01-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARUMUGAM
Adv. ALWINDEVAKUMAR G
Respondent(s)
SIVASANKARAN S Advocate - SARAVANAN R
MOGANDASS S
Adv. SARAVANAN R
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 25-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 05-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 CPC to admit additional documents as exhibits has been allowed. The District Munsif held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to present sufficient evidence to prove the case regarding alleged illegal property transfer, with document validity to be determined after full trial and respondents retaining cross-examination rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 CPC to admit additional documents as exhibits has been allowed. The District Munsif held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to present sufficient evidence to prove the case regarding alleged illegal property transfer, with document validity to be determined after full trial and respondents retaining cross-examination rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts