DEVIKA G vs MURUGESAN R S Advocate - PRABAKARAN S — 94/2022
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP080001732022
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
238/2022
Filing Date
19-09-2022
Registration No
94/2022
Registration Date
19-09-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVIKA G
Adv. MOHMED JAMALUDEEN S
NEELAVATHI G
Adv. MOHMED JAMALUDEEN S
Respondent(s)
MURUGESAN R S Advocate - PRABAKARAN S
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: This is a witness deposition (PW 1) in civil case OS. 94/2022 before the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam, involving a property dispute. The witness testified on 25.11.2025 regarding the sale of property, boundary walls, drainage issues, and allegations that the defendant demolished and reconstructed a house without the plaintiff's consent. The cross-examination was adjourned to a future date, and the defendant's lawyer requested continuation at a later hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: This is a witness deposition (PW 1) in civil case OS. 94/2022 before the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam, involving a property dispute. The witness testified on 25.11.2025 regarding the sale of property, boundary walls, drainage issues, and allegations that the defendant demolished and reconstructed a house without the plaintiff's consent. The cross-examination was adjourned to a future date, and the defendant's lawyer requested continuation at a later hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts