PRABAKARAN vs DAYALAN Advocate - S.MOHAMMED JAMALUDEEN — 10/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP080001452023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
241/2023
Filing Date
22-12-2023
Registration No
10/2024
Registration Date
02-02-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRABAKARAN
Adv. CHOZHAN K
Respondent(s)
DAYALAN Advocate - S.MOHAMMED JAMALUDEEN
LAILA
Adv. G.BABU
DHARMADURAI @ KHAN
Adv. S.MOHAMMED JAMALUDEEN
MEENAKSHI
Adv. G.BABU
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Trial
Trial
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Trial |
| 06-02-2026 | Trial |
| 08-01-2026 | Issues |
| 07-01-2026 | Issues |
| 16-12-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition for ad-interim injunction filed by Mr. A. Prabakaran was dismissed by the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam on November 27, 2025. The petitioner sought to restrain defendants from trespassing on inherited agricultural property (1.80 acres), alleging the 2019 sale deed was fraudulently executed using forged signatures. However, the court found that the petitioner failed to produce supporting documents, while the defendants presented registered sale deeds and a valid Power of Attorney executed by the legal heirs, establishing a serious title dispute that requires full adjudication rather than interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition for ad-interim injunction filed by Mr. A. Prabakaran was dismissed by the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam on November 27, 2025. The petitioner sought to restrain defendants from trespassing on inherited agricultural property (1.80 acres), alleging the 2019 sale deed was fraudulently executed using forged signatures. However, the court found that the petitioner failed to produce supporting documents, while the defendants presented registered sale deeds and a valid Power of Attorney executed by the legal heirs, establishing a serious title dispute that requires full adjudication rather than interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts