SOGAMUTHU AMMAL P vs RAMACHANDRAN S Advocate - RAMAMOORTHY P — 90/2018

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(C). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP080001342018

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

Filing Number

134/2018

Filing Date

20-11-2018

Registration No

90/2018

Registration Date

20-11-2018

Court

District Munsif Court, Arakkonam

Judge

4-District Munsif, Arakkonam

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 27(C)

Petitioner(s)

SOGAMUTHU AMMAL P

Adv. RAVICHANDIRAN N T

Respondent(s)

RAMACHANDRAN S Advocate - RAMAMOORTHY P

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam

05-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

28-01-2026

Evidence

09-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This document is a witness deposition (PW 7 - Sarmila, age 42) recorded on 05.02.2026 in OS. 90/2018 before the District Munsif Court of Arakkonam, relating to a property dispute (Survey No. 755). The witness testified regarding a sale deed between Perumal (plaintiff) and Ramachandran (defendant), confirming knowledge of the transaction and property details, though she claimed limited knowledge of specific transaction amounts and other documentary details. No final court order/judgment is issued in this document—it only records the witness examination and cross-examination, with no determination of the case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition (PW 7 - Sarmila, age 42) recorded on 05.02.2026 in OS. 90/2018 before the District Munsif Court of Arakkonam, relating to a property dispute (Survey No. 755). The witness testified regarding a sale deed between Perumal (plaintiff) and Ramachandran (defendant), confirming knowledge of the transaction and property details, though she claimed limited knowledge of specific transaction amounts and other documentary details. No final court order/judgment is issued in this document—it only records the witness examination and cross-examination, with no determination of the case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case