Nageswari vs Kumaresan Advocate - MOHMED JAMALUDEEN S, SAMBATHKUMAR S P, SAMBATHKUMAR S PExpartee, — 100150/2012
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7RULE1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNRP080001122012
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100150/2012
Filing Date
08-11-2012
Registration No
100150/2012
Registration Date
08-11-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nageswari
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
JANAKI
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
VIJAYAN
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
UMA
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
AMUDHA
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
KISHNAVENI
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
BHARATHI
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
Respondent(s)
Kumaresan Advocate - MOHMED JAMALUDEEN S, SAMBATHKUMAR S P, SAMBATHKUMAR S PExpartee,
RAMESH ALIAS VELUMANI
Adv. EXPARTE
KAMATCHI
Adv. EXPARTE
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 19-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif Court of Arakkonam decreed the partition suit in favor of the seven plaintiffs, awarding them a 7/9 share in the ancestral properties. The court found that the properties were self-acquired by the plaintiffs' parents (not joint family property as defendants claimed) and that all legal heirs, including daughters, have equal succession rights under Hindu law. The court granted permanent injunction against the defendants and declared all prior alienations of the plaintiffs' share null and void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif Court of Arakkonam decreed the partition suit in favor of the seven plaintiffs, awarding them a 7/9 share in the ancestral properties. The court found that the properties were self-acquired by the plaintiffs' parents (not joint family property as defendants claimed) and that all legal heirs, including daughters, have equal succession rights under Hindu law. The court granted permanent injunction against the defendants and declared all prior alienations of the plaintiffs' share null and void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts