NATARAJA PILLAI vs VALLIAMMAL Advocate - HAROON RASHEETH P — 100003/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNRP080000632009
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
100003/2009
Filing Date
06-01-2009
Registration No
100003/2009
Registration Date
06-01-2009
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATARAJA PILLAI
Adv. RAVI D
SELVARAJ A
Adv. RAVI D
KARUNAKARAN
Adv. RAVI D
SUBRAMANI
Adv. RAVI D
Respondent(s)
VALLIAMMAL Advocate - HAROON RASHEETH P
THULASI NATHAN
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
GOPAL NAIKER
Adv. DIED
KAMATCHI
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
THANIGA
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
BALU
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
VASUDHAVAN
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
KALA
Adv. HAROON RASHEETH P
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is the deposition of Witness DW 3 in a civil suit (OS. 03/2009) before the District Munsif of Arakkonam, recorded on 25.02.2026. The witness testifies regarding property transactions involving a 2.5-acre survey plot, with cross-examination questions about the sale of 1.61 acres to defendant Kannammalu and disputes over remaining property shares. No final judgment or court order is issued in this document — it records only the witness examination during trial proceedings, with no bail, petition decision, or adjournment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is the deposition of Witness DW 3 in a civil suit (OS. 03/2009) before the District Munsif of Arakkonam, recorded on 25.02.2026. The witness testifies regarding property transactions involving a 2.5-acre survey plot, with cross-examination questions about the sale of 1.61 acres to defendant Kannammalu and disputes over remaining property shares. No final judgment or court order is issued in this document — it records only the witness examination during trial proceedings, with no bail, petition decision, or adjournment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts