LAKSHMI M vs MEENAMMAL S Advocate - EXPARTE — 107/2022
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP080000262022
Filing Number
36/2022
Filing Date
04-Feb-2022
Registration No
107/2022
Registration Date
09-Nov-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAKSHMI M
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
-
2.MADHAVAN S
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
-
3.ELANGOVAN M
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
-
4.AMUTHATHAMIZH M
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
Respondent(s)
-
1.MEENAMMAL S Advocate - EXPARTE
-
2.SAMPATHKUMAR S
Adv. EXPARTE
-
3.RADHAKRISHNAN S
Adv. EXPARTE
-
4.UDHAYAKUMAR G
Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P
-
5.AMSAVENI V
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
-
6.MURALIKRISHNAN
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
-
7.JAYAKANDHAN
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
-
8.JANARTHANAN V
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
-
9.THE THASILDHAR, ARAKKONAM
Adv. EXPARTE
-
10.THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, ARAKKONAM TOWN
Adv. EXPARTE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The District Munsif Court, Arakkonam dismissed the suit filed by four plaintiffs seeking declaration that they and three defendants are legal heirs of deceased S. Ganeshbabu. The suit was dismissed for default because the principal witness (PW1) failed to appear for examination despite sufficient time being granted, and no representation was provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
06-Oct-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
15-Sep-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
21-Aug-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
29-Jul-2025
Mediation
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
22-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
06-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
05-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
01-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
11-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
19-Jun-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
25-Apr-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
07-Mar-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
26-Feb-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
08-Feb-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
18-Dec-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
10-Oct-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
21-Sep-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
28-Aug-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
16-Aug-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
21-Jun-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
09-Jun-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
02-Jun-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
18-Apr-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
05-Apr-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
24-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
20-Jan-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
19-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
09-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
01-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Arakkonam
-
09-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 107/2022
The District Munsif Court, Arakkonam dismissed the suit filed by four plaintiffs seeking declaration that they and three defendants are legal heirs of deceased S. Ganeshbabu. The suit was dismissed for default because the principal witness (PW1) failed to appear for examination despite sufficient time being granted, and no representation was provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts