LAKSHMI M vs MEENAMMAL S Advocate - EXPARTE — 107/2022
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP080000262022
Filing Number
36/2022
Filing Date
04-02-2022
Registration No
107/2022
Registration Date
09-11-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAKSHMI M
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
MADHAVAN S
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
ELANGOVAN M
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
AMUTHATHAMIZH M
Adv. SENTHIL KUMAR V
Respondent(s)
MEENAMMAL S Advocate - EXPARTE
SAMPATHKUMAR S
Adv. EXPARTE
RADHAKRISHNAN S
Adv. EXPARTE
UDHAYAKUMAR G
Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P
AMSAVENI V
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
MURALIKRISHNAN
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
JAYAKANDHAN
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
JANARTHANAN V
Adv. P.RAMAMOORTHY
THE THASILDHAR, ARAKKONAM
Adv. EXPARTE
THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, ARAKKONAM TOWN
Adv. EXPARTE
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 07-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Munsif Court, Arakkonam dismissed the suit filed by four plaintiffs seeking declaration that they and three defendants are legal heirs of deceased S. Ganeshbabu. The suit was dismissed for default because the principal witness (PW1) failed to appear for examination despite sufficient time being granted, and no representation was provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The District Munsif Court, Arakkonam dismissed the suit filed by four plaintiffs seeking declaration that they and three defendants are legal heirs of deceased S. Ganeshbabu. The suit was dismissed for default because the principal witness (PW1) failed to appear for examination despite sufficient time being granted, and no representation was provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts