BAKIYAM vs BHAVANI — 26/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s.25(d) , 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP080000212023
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
32/2023
Filing Date
31-01-2023
Registration No
26/2023
Registration Date
28-03-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Arakkonam
Judge
4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BAKIYAM
Adv. MAHALAKSHMI G
S.S.MYTHILI
Adv. G.MAHALAKSHMI
M.P.SHRIDHAR
Respondent(s)
BHAVANI
M.P.GAYATHRI
M.P.LOGITHA
THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKKONAM
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Munsif, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of Witness PW1 (Maitili, age 51) in OS. 26/2023 before the District Munsif Court of Arakkonam, dated 21.01.2026. The witness testified regarding a succession certificate case involving railway employee Puzhanivel's estate, detailing changes made to family nominee lists and the identification of legal heirs, with cross-examination by the sixth defendant's counsel. The case involves competing claims of heirship and references to related family court proceedings and Central Administrative Tribunal matters, but no final court order/judgment is provided in this excerpt—only the witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of Witness PW1 (Maitili, age 51) in OS. 26/2023 before the District Munsif Court of Arakkonam, dated 21.01.2026. The witness testified regarding a succession certificate case involving railway employee Puzhanivel's estate, detailing changes made to family nominee lists and the identification of legal heirs, with cross-examination by the sixth defendant's counsel. The case involves competing claims of heirship and references to related family court proceedings and Central Administrative Tribunal matters, but no final court order/judgment is provided in this excerpt—only the witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts