KIRAN MAYI V vs JANAKI RAMAN Advocate - RAMAMOORTHY P — 233/2019
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2) 27c. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP070004342019
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
360/2019
Filing Date
11-02-2016
Registration No
233/2019
Registration Date
04-03-2016
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam
Judge
3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KIRAN MAYI V
Adv. SARAVANAN R
Respondent(s)
JANAKI RAMAN Advocate - RAMAMOORTHY P
VURANDURU VANI
SATHYAVATHY
MANIKANDAN
J B VIJAYAKUMAR
SREE REKHA
CHANDRA SEKARA RAO
KRISHNAN
RAGUPATHY
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 23-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 233/2019 before the Special Subordinate Judge (LAOP Cases), Arakkonam, the deposition of plaintiff's witness (D.W.1) was recorded on 23.02.2026. The witness testified regarding disputed joint family property matters, property transfers, and settlement documents, addressing questions about his share in the property and various conveyance deeds executed between 2007-2026. The cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness was completed, and no re-examination of the first defendant was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 233/2019 before the Special Subordinate Judge (LAOP Cases), Arakkonam, the deposition of plaintiff's witness (D.W.1) was recorded on 23.02.2026. The witness testified regarding disputed joint family property matters, property transfers, and settlement documents, addressing questions about his share in the property and various conveyance deeds executed between 2007-2026. The cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness was completed, and no re-examination of the first defendant was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts