ANANDHA vs VASANTHA Advocate - RAMAMOORTHY P — 171/2019

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25b 27c. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP070003722019

Part Heard

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

Filing Number

298/2019

Filing Date

12-10-2019

Registration No

171/2019

Registration Date

12-10-2019

Court

Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam

Judge

3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25b 27c

Petitioner(s)

ANANDHA

Adv. ARUMUGAM K N

SANTHI

NEGARAJAN

LAKSHMI

KUMAR

JANAKIRAMAN

BOOPATHI

Respondent(s)

VASANTHA Advocate - RAMAMOORTHY P

SANTHI

Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P

SUMATHI

Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P

CHITRA

Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P

ARUMUGAM

Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P

VENKATESAN

Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P

KARNAN

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

05-03-2026

Part Heard

26-02-2026

Part Heard

17-02-2026

Part Heard

10-02-2026

Part Heard

05-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

05-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

In O.S. No. 171/2019 before the Special Subordinate Judge (LAOP Cases), Arakkonam, the deposition of Plaintiff's witness (PW.2) was recorded on 05.03.2026. The witness testified that he had no knowledge of the case details, survey numbers, parties involved, or claims being made, stating he was appearing merely as a supporting witness. The cross-examination of the defendants' witnesses was completed, and no re-examination was conducted by the plaintiff's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 171/2019 before the Special Subordinate Judge (LAOP Cases), Arakkonam, the deposition of Plaintiff's witness (PW.2) was recorded on 05.03.2026. The witness testified that he had no knowledge of the case details, survey numbers, parties involved, or claims being made, stating he was appearing merely as a supporting witness. The cross-examination of the defendants' witnesses was completed, and no re-examination was conducted by the plaintiff's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case