UNION BANK OF INDIA, ARAKKONAM vs PANDURANGAN — 172/2026
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP070001972026
Filing Number
197/2026
Filing Date
13-Dec-2023
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
05-Sep-2024
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam
Judge
3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION BANK OF INDIA, ARAKKONAM
Adv. MURALI K M
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANDURANGAN
Case History
-
22-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
Summary: In O.S. No. 172/2026 before the Special Sub Judge dealing with L.A.O.P. cases in Arakkonam, the deposition of plaintiff's witness (P.W.1), Kishore Kumar, Branch Manager of Union Bank of India, was recorded on 15.04.2026. The witness affirmed documents related to a term loan agreement dated 19.08.2020, including loan application, sanction letter, hypothecation agreement, promissory note, and legal notice dated 19.09.2023. Cross-examination was adjourned as the defendant did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
30-Mar-2026
Trial
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
18-Mar-2026
Trial
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
09-Mar-2026
Trial
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2026
Summary: In O.S. No. 172/2026 before the Special Sub Judge dealing with L.A.O.P. cases in Arakkonam, the deposition of plaintiff's witness (P.W.1), Kishore Kumar, Branch Manager of Union Bank of India, was recorded on 15.04.2026. The witness affirmed documents related to a term loan agreement dated 19.08.2020, including loan application, sanction letter, hypothecation agreement, promissory note, and legal notice dated 19.09.2023. Cross-examination was adjourned as the defendant did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts