SARALA B vs KANNAPPAN D Advocate - SILAMBARASAN G — 143/2026

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP070001552026

Filing Number

155/2026

Filing Date

07-Oct-2020

Registration No

143/2026

Registration Date

09-Oct-2020

Court

Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam

Judge

3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARALA B

    Adv. ARIDAS S M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANNAPPAN D Advocate - SILAMBARASAN G

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Special Sub Court in Arakkonam dismissed B. Sarala's suit for recovery of Rs. 3,42,000 (with 24% interest on Rs. 2,42,000) against D. Kannappan for default. The court found that despite being given sufficient time, neither party took steps to amend the plaint, leading to dismissal without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 07-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Sub Court in Arakkonam dismissed B. Sarala's suit for recovery of Rs. 3,42,000 (with 24% interest on Rs. 2,42,000) against D. Kannappan for default. The court found that despite being given sufficient time, neither party took steps to amend the plaint, leading to dismissal without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case