RAMESH J vs DURAI KANNAMMAL S — 118/2025
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 37(2),27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP070001342025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
134/2025
Filing Date
05-07-2019
Registration No
118/2025
Registration Date
06-07-2019
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam
Judge
3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESH J
Adv. VENKATESAN S
SURESH J
Adv. VENKATESAN S
Respondent(s)
DURAI KANNAMMAL S
UMA LAKSHMI M (AMENDED AS PER ORDER IN IA.17/2022, DATED 21.02.
MINOR JAGAN M REP BY HIS MOTHER UMA LAKSHMI THE 2ND DEFENDATN HEREIN
MINOR THARIKA M REP BY ITS UMA LAKSHMI THE 2ND DEFENDANT
BALASUBRAMANI S
BANUMATHI S
SANTHI S
JAYABHARATHI S
VIJAYALAKSHMI J
MANOKARAN J
DINAKARAN J
SATHISH KUMAR J
JAYANTHI J
JAMUNA RANI J
THE SUB REGISTRAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Court for Scheduled Caste Land Disputes in Arakkonam dismissed the plaintiffs' suit (O.S. No. 118/2025) and declined to grant the requested relief including partition of property and a permanent injunction. The court found that the plaintiffs' claims lacked merit, and thus rejected their petition without awarding them the reliefs sought, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Special Court for Scheduled Caste Land Disputes in Arakkonam dismissed the plaintiffs' suit (O.S. No. 118/2025) and declined to grant the requested relief including partition of property and a permanent injunction. The court found that the plaintiffs' claims lacked merit, and thus rejected their petition without awarding them the reliefs sought, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts