GOVINDASAMY vs NARASIMHAN S Advocate - KATHIR NARASIMMAN N — 101/2025
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(B). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP070001102025
Filing Number
110/2025
Filing Date
22-Mar-2024
Registration No
101/2025
Registration Date
22-Mar-2024
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam
Judge
3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVINDASAMY
Adv. NARASIMHAN R
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARASIMHAN S Advocate - KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
-
2.NAGARAJ N
Adv. KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
-
3.THANGARAJ ALIAS ARUNKUMAR
Adv. KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
-
4.SHANTHI
Adv. KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
-
5.KUPPAN
Adv. KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
-
6.KARUNAVATHI K
Adv. KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
-
7.SUMITHRA N
Adv. KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
-
8.DHAKSHIYANI T
Adv. KATHIR NARASIMMAN N
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Decree/Decretal OrderView PDF
The Special Court for Land Disputes in Arakkonam allowed Govindasamy's suit and granted a permanent injunction restraining the respondents (Narasimhan and 7 others) from interfering with or obstructing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of a vacant site in Vailambadi village, Ranipet District (valued at Rs. 1,18,215). The court declared the petitioner's rights over the property and ordered the respondents to cease any interference with his possession and use of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
18-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
09-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
02-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
25-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
18-Nov-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
11-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
30-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
28-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
14-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
09-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
07-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
09-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
26-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
19-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
12-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
05-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
28-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
22-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
08-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
26-Jun-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
11-Jun-2025
Trial
Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
-
04-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 101/2025
The Special Court for Land Disputes in Arakkonam allowed Govindasamy's suit and granted a permanent injunction restraining the respondents (Narasimhan and 7 others) from interfering with or obstructing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of a vacant site in Vailambadi village, Ranipet District (valued at Rs. 1,18,215). The court declared the petitioner's rights over the property and ordered the respondents to cease any interference with his possession and use of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts