KRISHNA REDDI N vs BABU Advocate - ARUMUGAM K N — 11/2025
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(b),25(d). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP070000112025
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
11/2025
Filing Date
18-12-2019
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2019
Court
Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam
Judge
3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRISHNA REDDI N
Adv. TAMIL SELVAN E
Respondent(s)
BABU Advocate - ARUMUGAM K N
RAMESH K
Adv. ARUMUGAM K N
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
THE TASILDHAR
THE SUB REGISTRAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 26-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 17-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 29-01-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary O.S. No. 11/2025 - Special Sub Judge Court, Arakkonam The court recorded the deposition of the plaintiff's witness (D.W.1) on 17.02.2026 in a land dispute case. The witness testified regarding property ownership, sale documents (primarily Document P.W.A-1 dated 14.06.1950), and conflicting survey numbers (501/14 vs. 502) concerning 35 cents of land. The witness's cross-examination by the defendant's counsel proceeded, focusing on land measurements, title transfers, and discrepancies in property documentation. The case was adjourned with defendant's cross-examination to continue, with documentary evidence marked and recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary O.S. No. 11/2025 - Special Sub Judge Court, Arakkonam The court recorded the deposition of the plaintiff's witness (D.W.1) on 17.02.2026 in a land dispute case. The witness testified regarding property ownership, sale documents (primarily Document P.W.A-1 dated 14.06.1950), and conflicting survey numbers (501/14 vs. 502) concerning 35 cents of land. The witness's cross-examination by the defendant's counsel proceeded, focusing on land measurements, title transfers, and discrepancies in property documentation. The case was adjourned with defendant's cross-examination to continue, with documentary evidence marked and recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts