Inspector of Police, Nemili vs Sathishkumar Alias Appu — 226/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 395,397. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP050009682024
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
332/2024
Filing Date
10-12-2024
Registration No
226/2024
Registration Date
16-12-2024
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
NEMILI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Nemili
Respondent(s)
Sathishkumar Alias Appu
Marimuthu alias Vikkram
Aribabu
Deepak Kumar Alias Deepak
Gowthaman Alias Praveenkumar
Karuppu alias Ashokumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 01-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 18-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 23-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a witness deposition (PW-9) in SC.No.226/2024 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, dated 09.03.2026. The witness, a 50-year-old Special Assistant Investigator, testified regarding the recording of confessional statements from accused persons arrested in a case registered under IPC Section 392 (dacoity). The cross-examination by the defence was completed as no defence counsel appeared. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a witness deposition (PW-9) in SC.No.226/2024 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, dated 09.03.2026. The witness, a 50-year-old Special Assistant Investigator, testified regarding the recording of confessional statements from accused persons arrested in a case registered under IPC Section 392 (dacoity). The cross-examination by the defence was completed as no defence counsel appeared. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts