INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs VIJAYAKUMAR — 84/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,341,302. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP050004912024
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
80/2024
Filing Date
29-01-2024
Registration No
84/2024
Registration Date
29-01-2024
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR DISTRICT SESSION COURT VELLORE
Respondent(s)
VIJAYAKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 19-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 05-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 19-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 03-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (PW-10) in a murder case (SC.No.84 & 85/2024) before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, dated 07.08.2025. The witness, a 35-year-old village assistant, testified about police investigation into a murder case involving two accused persons (Nishant and Dilip), describing how he witnessed evidence collection including weapons and documented the process. During cross-examination, the witness contradicted certain details about the investigation procedure and his own written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (PW-10) in a murder case (SC.No.84 & 85/2024) before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, dated 07.08.2025. The witness, a 35-year-old village assistant, testified about police investigation into a murder case involving two accused persons (Nishant and Dilip), describing how he witnessed evidence collection including weapons and documented the process. During cross-examination, the witness contradicted certain details about the investigation procedure and his own written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts