INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs MANI ALIAS MANIKANDAN — 67/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNRP050004572024

Issue of Service

Next Hearing

17th March 2026

Filing Number

63/2024

Filing Date

22-06-2023

Registration No

67/2024

Registration Date

22-06-2023

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Petitioner(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR DISTRICT SESSION COURT VELLORE

Respondent(s)

MANI ALIAS MANIKANDAN

RAMU ALIAS IYYER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

05-03-2026

Issue of Service

19-02-2026

Issue of Service

05-02-2026

Issue of Service

19-01-2026

Appearance

03-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

19-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW-5) in case SC.No. 67/2024 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. The witness Muthu (36 years old) testified on 19.02.2026 regarding a criminal matter involving the death of an individual named Paskaran, describing how he and others found the decomposed body with injuries in Pudur Perumal Lake area on 12.11.2016. Cross-examination by the defense counsel was not completed as the defense advocate was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW-5) in case SC.No. 67/2024 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. The witness Muthu (36 years old) testified on 19.02.2026 regarding a criminal matter involving the death of an individual named Paskaran, describing how he and others found the decomposed body with injuries in Pudur Perumal Lake area on 12.11.2016. Cross-examination by the defense counsel was not completed as the defense advocate was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case