INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TOWN PS vs SRINIVASAN — 40/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP050004032024
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2024
Filing Date
21-12-2020
Registration No
40/2024
Registration Date
21-12-2020
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
FIR Details
FIR Number
165
Police Station
Arakkonam Town
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TOWN PS (Police Station)
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
SRINIVASAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 23-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 23-02-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 18-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of Witness 7 (Sri. Thamodaran, age 63) in Case SC.No.40/2024 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, dated 23.03.2026. The witness, a retired police officer, testified regarding his role in a 2008 murder case (Crime No.165/2008, IPC Section 302), including the handling of post-mortem procedures and evidence collection. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel was not completed as the defense lawyer failed to appear, and no further examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of Witness 7 (Sri. Thamodaran, age 63) in Case SC.No.40/2024 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, dated 23.03.2026. The witness, a retired police officer, testified regarding his role in a 2008 murder case (Crime No.165/2008, IPC Section 302), including the handling of post-mortem procedures and evidence collection. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel was not completed as the defense lawyer failed to appear, and no further examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts