INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONDAPALAYAM PS vs VELU — 30/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,34. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP050003832024
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
26/2024
Filing Date
20-02-2020
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
20-02-2020
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONDAPALAYAM PS (Police Station)
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
VELU
SIVAKUMAR
SELVAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 19-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 19-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 03-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of witness PW-13 (Thiru Prabakaran, age 33, Assistant Investigator) in case SC.No. 30/2024 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, dated 05.03.2026. The witness testified regarding FIR No. 285/2019 under IPC Section 302 (murder) filed based on a complaint by Rukmani regarding her husband Jagannathan's death on 23.07.2019, and confirmed he filed the First Information Report and forwarded it to the court. Cross-examination by defendants 1 and 3 was completed, and cross-examination by defendant 2's counsel was marked as closed due to no counsel appearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of witness PW-13 (Thiru Prabakaran, age 33, Assistant Investigator) in case SC.No. 30/2024 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, dated 05.03.2026. The witness testified regarding FIR No. 285/2019 under IPC Section 302 (murder) filed based on a complaint by Rukmani regarding her husband Jagannathan's death on 23.07.2019, and confirmed he filed the First Information Report and forwarded it to the court. Cross-examination by defendants 1 and 3 was completed, and cross-examination by defendant 2's counsel was marked as closed due to no counsel appearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts