INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs VARUNRAJ — 21/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,302,302,r-w114,149. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP050003652024
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
17/2024
Filing Date
20-03-2019
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
20-03-2019
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
VARUNRAJ
SARANRAJ
RAJASEKAR
VIJAY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Issue of Service
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 19-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 06-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 21-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 06-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
This is a deposition of witness (PW-12) in case SC.No.21/2024 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. The witness, a 31-year-old driver named Shankar, provided testimony on 05.03.2026 regarding events from April-May 2014 involving a festival visit and a vehicle. The witness testified about accompanying his friend Milton to a festival, witnessing a van transaction, and providing details to investigating officials about the incident, though the defense counsel did not cross-examine him due to absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a deposition of witness (PW-12) in case SC.No.21/2024 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. The witness, a 31-year-old driver named Shankar, provided testimony on 05.03.2026 regarding events from April-May 2014 involving a festival visit and a vehicle. The witness testified about accompanying his friend Milton to a festival, witnessing a van transaction, and providing details to investigating officials about the incident, though the defense counsel did not cross-examine him due to absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts