DHANALAKSHMI E vs THUKKARAM A — 114/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section OR7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP050003052024
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
150/2024
Filing Date
15-02-2019
Registration No
114/2024
Registration Date
01-03-2019
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANALAKSHMI E
Adv. RADHAKRISHNAN J
NALINI
Adv. RADHAKRISHNAN J
RAJARAM E
Adv. RADHAKRISHNAN J
SIVARAMAN E
Adv. RADHAKRISHNAN J
Respondent(s)
THUKKARAM A
RANJANI
SATHASIVAM T
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is an Original Suit (OS.NO: 114/2024) heard by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam on 05.03.2026, involving a property dispute in Tamil Nadu. The court completed cross-examination of Defendant 1-4 regarding land ownership and partition matters, with witness testimony addressing claims about property registration (Pattas numbered 1503 and 1972), family partition, and the involvement of the District Revenue Officer (DRO). The court dismissed the petition (Final Order: Dismissed), rejecting the plaintiff's claims and finding no merit in the arguments regarding property rights and partition division. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is an Original Suit (OS.NO: 114/2024) heard by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam on 05.03.2026, involving a property dispute in Tamil Nadu. The court completed cross-examination of Defendant 1-4 regarding land ownership and partition matters, with witness testimony addressing claims about property registration (Pattas numbered 1503 and 1972), family partition, and the involvement of the District Revenue Officer (DRO). The court dismissed the petition (Final Order: Dismissed), rejecting the plaintiff's claims and finding no merit in the arguments regarding property rights and partition division. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts