INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TOWN PS vs GOPINATH — 57/2025

Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1A)-ARMSACT. Status: Remand. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNRP050001812025

Remand

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

10-05-2025

Filing Number

135/2025

Filing Date

09-06-2025

Registration No

57/2025

Registration Date

09-06-2025

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

FIR Details

FIR Number

233

Police Station

Arakkonam Town

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

ARMS ACT, 1959 Section 25(1A)-ARMSACT

Petitioner(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TOWN PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

GOPINATH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

06-04-2026

Remand

23-03-2026

Remand

09-03-2026

Remand

02-03-2026

Remand

23-02-2026

Remand

Interim Orders

23-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This document is a witness deposition record (not a final court order with a substantive outcome). The witness (PW-1), a 36-year-old police officer, gave testimony on 23.03.2026 regarding an arrest made on 17.03.2025 involving a dangerous weapon. The court recorded the witness's statement, admitted documentary evidence, and noted that cross-examination by the defense counsel could not be completed as the defense counsel was absent. No final judgment, bail decision, or petition outcome is contained in this document—it is merely a procedural record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record (not a final court order with a substantive outcome). The witness (PW-1), a 36-year-old police officer, gave testimony on 23.03.2026 regarding an arrest made on 17.03.2025 involving a dangerous weapon. The court recorded the witness's statement, admitted documentary evidence, and noted that cross-examination by the defense counsel could not be completed as the defense counsel was absent. No final judgment, bail decision, or petition outcome is contained in this document—it is merely a procedural record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case