Inspector of Police, Ponnai vs Rajesh Advocate - VENKATESAN K — 49/2025

Case under Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

Issue of Service Next hearing 17-Mar-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNRP050001772025

Filing Number

131/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

49/2025

Registration Date

03-Jun-2025

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Ponnai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Advocate - VENKATESAN K

Case History

  1. 17-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    This document is a deposition of witness (PW-7) in case SC.No.49/2025 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, recorded on 05.03.2026. The witness, a 58-year-old driving instructor, testified regarding damage to a bus (TN 23 N 2371) on 16.01.2025, providing a valuation certificate totaling ₹12,500 for broken glass and other damage. The court examined and marked the valuation documents as exhibits A.Th.Sa.8 and A.Th.Sa.9, and during cross-examination, the witness's testimony regarding the damage assessment and timeline was tested but ultimately upheld by the judge as credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    For further Proceedings

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    For further Proceedings

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  16. 06-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  17. 06-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Trial

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  19. 16-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  20. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    Trial

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  22. 14-Aug-2025

    Trial

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  23. 06-Aug-2025

    Orders

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  24. 23-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  25. 04-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  26. 20-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a deposition of witness (PW-7) in case SC.No.49/2025 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, recorded on 05.03.2026. The witness, a 58-year-old driving instructor, testified regarding damage to a bus (TN 23 N 2371) on 16.01.2025, providing a valuation certificate totaling ₹12,500 for broken glass and other damage. The court examined and marked the valuation documents as exhibits A.Th.Sa.8 and A.Th.Sa.9, and during cross-examination, the witness's testimony regarding the damage assessment and timeline was tested but ultimately upheld by the judge as credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case