Inspector of Police, Ponnai vs Rajesh Advocate - VENKATESAN K — 49/2025
Case under Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP050001772025
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
131/2025
Filing Date
03-06-2025
Registration No
49/2025
Registration Date
03-06-2025
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Ponnai
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Advocate - VENKATESAN K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 19-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 20-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 03-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (PW-7) in case SC.No.49/2025 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, recorded on 05.03.2026. The witness, a 58-year-old driving instructor, testified regarding damage to a bus (TN 23 N 2371) on 16.01.2025, providing a valuation certificate totaling ₹12,500 for broken glass and other damage. The court examined and marked the valuation documents as exhibits A.Th.Sa.8 and A.Th.Sa.9, and during cross-examination, the witness's testimony regarding the damage assessment and timeline was tested but ultimately upheld by the judge as credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (PW-7) in case SC.No.49/2025 before the II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, recorded on 05.03.2026. The witness, a 58-year-old driving instructor, testified regarding damage to a bus (TN 23 N 2371) on 16.01.2025, providing a valuation certificate totaling ₹12,500 for broken glass and other damage. The court examined and marked the valuation documents as exhibits A.Th.Sa.8 and A.Th.Sa.9, and during cross-examination, the witness's testimony regarding the damage assessment and timeline was tested but ultimately upheld by the judge as credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts