ARUNODHAYAN vs ARUMUGAM Advocate - SOLMUTHU AZHAGAN K — 60/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b), 27(c), 25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP050001722025
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
44/2025
Filing Date
09-06-2025
Registration No
60/2025
Registration Date
09-06-2025
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARUNODHAYAN
Adv. RADHAKRISHNAN J
Respondent(s)
ARUMUGAM Advocate - SOLMUTHU AZHAGAN K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: OS.No.60/2025 | Court: II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District The witness (PW-1), Thiruarunodhayan, aged 33, gave sworn testimony under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 on 02.04.2026 in a civil suit. The witness identified and marked 21 documentary exhibits (Ex.A1 through Ex.A21) including property deeds, sale agreements, cancellation documents, and authority certificates relating to property transactions dating from 1983 to 2025. The court adjourned the case to allow remaining exhibits to be marked and the examination-in-chief to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: OS.No.60/2025 | Court: II-Additional District Court, Arakkonam, Ranipet District The witness (PW-1), Thiruarunodhayan, aged 33, gave sworn testimony under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 on 02.04.2026 in a civil suit. The witness identified and marked 21 documentary exhibits (Ex.A1 through Ex.A21) including property deeds, sale agreements, cancellation documents, and authority certificates relating to property transactions dating from 1983 to 2025. The court adjourned the case to allow remaining exhibits to be marked and the examination-in-chief to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts