Inspector of Police vs Dhachanamoorthy Advocate - KUMAR N — 42/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),302. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNRP050001622025

Issue of Service

Next Hearing

17th March 2026

Filing Number

121/2025

Filing Date

02-06-2025

Registration No

42/2025

Registration Date

02-06-2025

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),302
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section DhachanamoorthyInspector of Police

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

Dhachanamoorthy Advocate - KUMAR N

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

05-03-2026

Issue of Service

19-02-2026

Issue of Service

05-02-2026

Issue of Service

20-01-2026

Issue of Service

05-01-2026

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

18-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: This is a deposition of witness (PW-10) in Case No. 42/2025 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, recorded on 18.11.2025. The witness, a 55-year-old female doctor, testified regarding the autopsy findings of a 23-year-old male (Case No. 70/2021), detailing multiple injuries including head trauma, fractured skull, and internal injuries suggesting death by blunt force. The witness's medical examination report was admitted as evidence, and no cross-examination was conducted by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: This is a deposition of witness (PW-10) in Case No. 42/2025 before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam, recorded on 18.11.2025. The witness, a 55-year-old female doctor, testified regarding the autopsy findings of a 23-year-old male (Case No. 70/2021), detailing multiple injuries including head trauma, fractured skull, and internal injuries suggesting death by blunt force. The witness's medical examination report was admitted as evidence, and no cross-examination was conducted by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case