INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAKKONAM TOWNN PS vs RANJITHKUMAR Advocate - RAVI R — 41/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),326,307,506(2),324. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP050001612025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
26-03-2025
Filing Number
120/2025
Filing Date
02-06-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
02-06-2025
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
Arakkonam Town
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAKKONAM TOWNN PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
RANJITHKUMAR Advocate - RAVI R
SELVAKUMAR ALIAS RENNI
Adv. RAVI R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 23-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 23-02-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 06-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Summary: Witness PW-4 (Sudhakaran, age 50) testified before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam on 20.01.2026 in case SC.No. 41/2025 under CrPC Section 317. During examination-in-chief, the witness confirmed his signature on the FIR document and provided his account of events from 15.01.2020. During cross-examination by the prosecution, the witness retracted his earlier statement, claiming he had given false testimony to protect the accused. No further examination or re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Witness PW-4 (Sudhakaran, age 50) testified before the II Additional District Court, Arakkonam on 20.01.2026 in case SC.No. 41/2025 under CrPC Section 317. During examination-in-chief, the witness confirmed his signature on the FIR document and provided his account of events from 15.01.2020. During cross-examination by the prosecution, the witness retracted his earlier statement, claiming he had given false testimony to protect the accused. No further examination or re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts