SIVAGURU R vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR RANIPET DISTRICT — 80/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP050001592024
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
80/2024
Filing Date
22-04-2022
Registration No
80/2024
Registration Date
22-04-2022
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIVAGURU R
Adv. GOKULRAJ R
Respondent(s)
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR RANIPET DISTRICT
THE TAHSILDAR, ARAKKONAM
THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
RAM MOHAN V
BALACHANDRAN V
JAWAHARBABU V
JAGADEESAN M
VIJAYAKUMAR K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: OS.NO: 80/2024 Court: II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam Date: 11.03.2026 The witness (PW 1) was recalled and examination-in-chief was completed; cross-examination of the 7th defendant proceeded. The court found the witness's testimony regarding property details, ownership documents, and timeline of events concerning inherited property (will executed in 2006) to be largely inconsistent and lacking in credibility. The witness could not substantiate claims of unauthorized occupation, failed to produce supporting documents, and admitted to prolonged inaction despite knowledge of the property matters. Order: Case adjourned for further proceedings; no bail or petition decision recorded on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: OS.NO: 80/2024 Court: II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam Date: 11.03.2026 The witness (PW 1) was recalled and examination-in-chief was completed; cross-examination of the 7th defendant proceeded. The court found the witness's testimony regarding property details, ownership documents, and timeline of events concerning inherited property (will executed in 2006) to be largely inconsistent and lacking in credibility. The witness could not substantiate claims of unauthorized occupation, failed to produce supporting documents, and admitted to prolonged inaction despite knowledge of the property matters. Order: Case adjourned for further proceedings; no bail or petition decision recorded on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts