SIVAGURU R vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR RANIPET DISTRICT — 80/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP050001592024

Filing Number

80/2024

Filing Date

22-Apr-2022

Registration No

80/2024

Registration Date

22-Apr-2022

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIVAGURU R

    Adv. GOKULRAJ R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR RANIPET DISTRICT

  2. 2.THE TAHSILDAR, ARAKKONAM

  3. 3.THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

  4. 4.RAM MOHAN V

  5. 5.BALACHANDRAN V

  6. 6.JAWAHARBABU V

  7. 7.JAGADEESAN M

  8. 8.VIJAYAKUMAR K

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: OS.NO: 80/2024 Court: II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam Date: 11.03.2026 The witness (PW 1) was recalled and examination-in-chief was completed; cross-examination of the 7th defendant proceeded. The court found the witness's testimony regarding property details, ownership documents, and timeline of events concerning inherited property (will executed in 2006) to be largely inconsistent and lacking in credibility. The witness could not substantiate claims of unauthorized occupation, failed to produce supporting documents, and admitted to prolonged inaction despite knowledge of the property matters. Order: Case adjourned for further proceedings; no bail or petition decision recorded on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  14. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  15. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  17. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  18. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  19. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  20. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  21. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  22. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  23. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  24. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  25. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  26. 03-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  27. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  28. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  29. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  30. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  31. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  32. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  33. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  34. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  35. 20-Aug-2025

    Trial

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  36. 13-Aug-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  37. 24-Jul-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  38. 16-Jul-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  39. 08-Jul-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  40. 24-Jun-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  41. 10-Jun-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  42. 19-Mar-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  43. 10-Feb-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  44. 17-Dec-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  45. 13-Nov-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  46. 24-Oct-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  47. 24-Sep-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  48. 21-Aug-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  49. 19-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  50. 12-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  51. 18-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 22-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 80/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: OS.NO: 80/2024 Court: II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam Date: 11.03.2026 The witness (PW 1) was recalled and examination-in-chief was completed; cross-examination of the 7th defendant proceeded. The court found the witness's testimony regarding property details, ownership documents, and timeline of events concerning inherited property (will executed in 2006) to be largely inconsistent and lacking in credibility. The witness could not substantiate claims of unauthorized occupation, failed to produce supporting documents, and admitted to prolonged inaction despite knowledge of the property matters. Order: Case adjourned for further proceedings; no bail or petition decision recorded on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case