INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs GOPI — 43/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 228. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP050000932026

Filing Number

67/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 228

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE

    Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the petition of the 9th accused (Gopi) to dispense with his personal attendance in the criminal trial for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, and 302, considering his claim of undergoing mouth-cancer treatment. However, the court imposed conditions that the accused must appear whenever his presence is required by the court and his counsel is permitted to represent him in his absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Orders

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 43/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition of the 9th accused (Gopi) to dispense with his personal attendance in the criminal trial for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, and 302, considering his claim of undergoing mouth-cancer treatment. However, the court imposed conditions that the accused must appear whenever his presence is required by the court and his counsel is permitted to represent him in his absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case