THE INSPECTOR. OF POLICE, SHOLINGHUR PS vs PRABU — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 339. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP050000902026
Filing Number
64/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam
Judge
1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE INSPECTOR. OF POLICE, SHOLINGHUR PS (Police Station)
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRABU
-
2.DHURAIMURUGAN
-
3.MADHAVAN
-
4.GAJAPATHIVARMA
-
5.SANKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The court granted permission to A. Veni Sri, the widow of deceased advocate S. Chakaravarthy, to assist the prosecution through her counsel under Section 339 of BNSS Act 2023 in the murder trial. The court recognized her as the de-facto complainant and victim with a direct interest in opposing the discharge petitions filed by accused A4 and A5, holding that victim participation aids fair trial while not prejudicing the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
-
26-Mar-2026
Orders
2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders
2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
-
23-Mar-2026
Counter
2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
-
18-Mar-2026
Counter
2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
-
13-Mar-2026
Counter
2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
-
09-Mar-2026
Counter
2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2026
The court granted permission to A. Veni Sri, the widow of deceased advocate S. Chakaravarthy, to assist the prosecution through her counsel under Section 339 of BNSS Act 2023 in the murder trial. The court recognized her as the de-facto complainant and victim with a direct interest in opposing the discharge petitions filed by accused A4 and A5, holding that victim participation aids fair trial while not prejudicing the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts