MAGESH R vs SESHASAYANAM R Advocate - DINESHKUMAR P — 24/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1 AND 2. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 18-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP050000472024

Filing Number

24/2024

Filing Date

22-Dec-2022

Registration No

24/2024

Registration Date

07-Jan-2023

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1 AND 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAGESH R

    Adv. RAMAMOORTHY P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SESHASAYANAM R Advocate - DINESHKUMAR P

Case History

  1. 18-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    SUMMARY This is a Tamil language court order (OS.NO: 24/2024) from the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam, dated 11.02.2026. The case involves a property dispute where the defendant (DW 1) testified during cross-examination regarding a sale deed (Exhibit A.1) for immovable property worth Rs. 45 lakhs. The defendant claimed he signed the document without reading it and that it was prepared by the plaintiff afterward. The court found the defendant's testimony contradictory and unreliable, ultimately ruling that the sale deed (Exhibit A.1) is valid and enforceable, and directed the plaintiff's claims be considered for appropriate relief including property transfer and return of earnest money as stipulated in the agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  11. 28-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  16. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  17. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  18. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  19. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  20. 20-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  21. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  22. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  23. 07-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  24. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  25. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  26. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  27. 09-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  28. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  29. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  30. 23-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  31. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  32. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  33. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  34. 03-Sep-2025

    For further Proceedings

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  35. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  36. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  37. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  38. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  39. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  40. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  41. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  42. 24-Jun-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  43. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  44. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  45. 06-Jun-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  46. 18-Mar-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  47. 12-Feb-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  48. 11-Feb-2025

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  49. 12-Dec-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  50. 11-Nov-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  51. 24-Oct-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  52. 13-Sep-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  53. 07-Aug-2024

    Issues

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  54. 04-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  55. 10-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

  56. 18-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 22-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 24/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY This is a Tamil language court order (OS.NO: 24/2024) from the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam, dated 11.02.2026. The case involves a property dispute where the defendant (DW 1) testified during cross-examination regarding a sale deed (Exhibit A.1) for immovable property worth Rs. 45 lakhs. The defendant claimed he signed the document without reading it and that it was prepared by the plaintiff afterward. The court found the defendant's testimony contradictory and unreliable, ultimately ruling that the sale deed (Exhibit A.1) is valid and enforceable, and directed the plaintiff's claims be considered for appropriate relief including property transfer and return of earnest money as stipulated in the agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case