THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHOLINGHUR P.S vs GAJAPATHI VARMA — 15/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 250. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP050000292026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

23/2026

Filing Date

23-01-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

23-01-2026

Court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam

Judge

1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 250

Petitioner(s)

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHOLINGHUR P.S

Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

GAJAPATHI VARMA

SANKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd Additional District Judge, Arakkonam

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Orders

09-03-2026

Orders

27-02-2026

Enquiry

20-02-2026

For further Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam dismissed the discharge petition filed by accused A4 and A5 in a murder case involving Advocate Chakaravarthy. The court found sufficient "grave suspicion" to proceed with trial, rejecting arguments that the case relied solely on a co-accused's confession and lacked independent evidence. The court held that at the discharge stage, it cannot conduct a detailed examination of evidence, and the alleged motive—retaliation for the accused's brother's murder—combined with prosecution materials, warranted continuation of proceedings under BNS Act provisions and Arms Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam dismissed the discharge petition filed by accused A4 and A5 in a murder case involving Advocate Chakaravarthy. The court found sufficient "grave suspicion" to proceed with trial, rejecting arguments that the case relied solely on a co-accused's confession and lacked independent evidence. The court held that at the discharge stage, it cannot conduct a detailed examination of evidence, and the alleged motive—retaliation for the accused's brother's murder—combined with prosecution materials, warranted continuation of proceedings under BNS Act provisions and Arms Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

II Additional District and Sessions Court, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case