D S Gokul vs K Mani — 110/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNRP040015592024
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2024
Filing Number
1534/2024
Filing Date
09-05-2024
Registration No
110/2024
Registration Date
15-05-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D S Gokul
Adv. SALAI MANMIYAN C
Respondent(s)
K Mani
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (PW-1), not a court order issuing a ruling. Witness D.S. Gokul testified on 05.02.2026 in case STC.NO.110/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet, regarding a dishonored cheque (No.121591, Rs.2,30,000/-) dated 25.03.2024 and related evidence including memo of dishonor, legal notice, and postal acknowledgment. The witness statement was recorded in Tamil, read back in open court in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (PW-1), not a court order issuing a ruling. Witness D.S. Gokul testified on 05.02.2026 in case STC.NO.110/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet, regarding a dishonored cheque (No.121591, Rs.2,30,000/-) dated 25.03.2024 and related evidence including memo of dishonor, legal notice, and postal acknowledgment. The witness statement was recorded in Tamil, read back in open court in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts