BALACHANDAR vs SYED SAHUL HAMEEDH — 403/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNRP040005602021
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
Filing Number
518/2021
Filing Date
08-04-2021
Registration No
403/2021
Registration Date
02-08-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALACHANDAR
Adv. SELVARAJ A G
Respondent(s)
SYED SAHUL HAMEEDH
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 10-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case STC.NO.403/2021 - Cross-examination of Witness (Lakshandran) This is a record of witness examination dated 07.10.2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet. The witness testified regarding a cheque (No. 832044) for Rs. 22,84,000 given on 20.02.2021, though the witness paid only Rs. 19,15,000 principal amount. The court found issues with the cheque being improperly filled by the witness himself rather than by the opposing party, and noted discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding the transaction details and intended purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case STC.NO.403/2021 - Cross-examination of Witness (Lakshandran) This is a record of witness examination dated 07.10.2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet. The witness testified regarding a cheque (No. 832044) for Rs. 22,84,000 given on 20.02.2021, though the witness paid only Rs. 19,15,000 principal amount. The court found issues with the cheque being improperly filled by the witness himself rather than by the opposing party, and noted discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding the transaction details and intended purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts