VIJAYARANGAM S vs GOKUL Advocate - SELVARAJ A G — 46/2014
Case under Civildefenceact Section ORDER7RULE1ANDSECTION26OFCPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP040003022014
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
177/2014
Filing Date
29-10-2014
Registration No
46/2014
Registration Date
29-10-2014
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAYARANGAM S
Adv. SELVARAJ A G
Respondent(s)
GOKUL Advocate - SELVARAJ A G
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Adv. NETHAJI N P
DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER
Adv. NETHAJI N P
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Adv. NETHAJI N P
THE THASILDAR
Adv. NETHAJI N P
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of witness DW-3 (Venkatesen, a village officer from Irungukkur) in O.S. No. 46/2014 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet, dated 18.03.2026. The witness was sworn in under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and testified regarding documents filed in the case, which were marked as exhibits. The deposition was recorded in Tamil, read back to the witness in the presence of the accused, and admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of witness DW-3 (Venkatesen, a village officer from Irungukkur) in O.S. No. 46/2014 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet, dated 18.03.2026. The witness was sworn in under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and testified regarding documents filed in the case, which were marked as exhibits. The deposition was recorded in Tamil, read back to the witness in the presence of the accused, and admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts