SATHISH A vs PALANI R — 8/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNRP040000502022

For further Proceedings

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

26/2022

Filing Date

03-03-2022

Registration No

8/2022

Registration Date

03-03-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet

Judge

5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138
MP/3/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section SATHISH APALANI R
MP/4/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section SATHISH APALANI R
MP/7/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section PALANI RSATHISH A

Petitioner(s)

SATHISH A

Adv. BAGAVATHKUMARAN R

Respondent(s)

PALANI R

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet

16-04-2026

For further Proceedings

26-03-2026

For further Proceedings

09-03-2026

For further Proceedings

24-02-2026

For further Proceedings

22-01-2026

For further Proceedings

Interim Orders

16-04-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This document is a deposition of witness (PW-2) in case STC.NO.8/2022 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet. The witness, a 34-year-old female, solemnly affirmed her statement on 16.04.2026 in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and the typewritten deposition was read over to her in Tamil in the presence of the accused and admitted for correction. This is a procedural recording of witness testimony and does not constitute a final court order on the case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a deposition of witness (PW-2) in case STC.NO.8/2022 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet. The witness, a 34-year-old female, solemnly affirmed her statement on 16.04.2026 in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and the typewritten deposition was read over to her in Tamil in the presence of the accused and admitted for correction. This is a procedural recording of witness testimony and does not constitute a final court order on the case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case