RAJESHKUMAR vs PRIYADHARSHINI — 38/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section S11R40 5(1). Status: Stay. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNRP030012992023
Filing Number
1060/2023
Filing Date
30-Nov-2023
Registration No
38/2024
Registration Date
13-Feb-2024
Court
Sub Court, Ranipet
Judge
4-Sub Judge, Ranipet
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESHKUMAR
Adv. SOLMUTHU AZHAGAN K
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRIYADHARSHINI
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Stay
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
09-Mar-2026
Stay
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
09-Feb-2026
Stay
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
05-Jan-2026
Stay
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
04-Nov-2025
Stay
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
28-Oct-2025
Appearance
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
22-Sep-2025
Appearance
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
05-Aug-2025
Stay
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
16-Jun-2025
Stay
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
26-Nov-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
Summary This is a matrimonial case (HMOP.NO.38/2024) heard on 26.11.2024 at Ranipet Subordinate Court under Section 10 of the 1973 Act. The petitioner (27-year-old male) presented evidence including marriage certificate, photographs, and a video CD alleging the respondent's prior marriage to one Bala, and requested the court to grant relief based on the documented evidence. The case appears to be at the evidence presentation stage with a prayer for a decree in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
13-Aug-2024
Counter
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
12-Jun-2024
Mediation
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
12-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Ranipet
-
13-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2024
Summary This is a matrimonial case (HMOP.NO.38/2024) heard on 26.11.2024 at Ranipet Subordinate Court under Section 10 of the 1973 Act. The petitioner (27-year-old male) presented evidence including marriage certificate, photographs, and a video CD alleging the respondent's prior marriage to one Bala, and requested the court to grant relief based on the documented evidence. The case appears to be at the evidence presentation stage with a prayer for a decree in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts