Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd Rep by Mr Boopalan vs Manoj — 246/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 08th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP020003742025
e-Filing Number
23-08-2025
Filing Number
374/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
246/2025
Registration Date
25-11-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd Rep by Mr Boopalan
Adv. LOKESH J
Respondent(s)
Manoj
Srividhya
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Disposed
Orders
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 23-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 16-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 09-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet granted Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, appointing an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property from borrowers Manoj and Srividhya. The court authorized the Commissioner to break open locks if necessary and instructed police to provide assistance; the petition was closed after the Advocate Commissioner's report confirmed possession was handed over to the petitioner bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet granted Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, appointing an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property from borrowers Manoj and Srividhya. The court authorized the Commissioner to break open locks if necessary and instructed police to provide assistance; the petition was closed after the Advocate Commissioner's report confirmed possession was handed over to the petitioner bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts