STATE BANK OF INDIA RASMECCC SARC vs K VIJAYAN — 152/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRP020001732025
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2025
Filing Number
173/2025
Filing Date
24-03-2025
Registration No
152/2025
Registration Date
15-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BANK OF INDIA RASMECCC SARC
Adv. Boopathi K M
Respondent(s)
K VIJAYAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 23-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 12-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 05-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 22-01-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (not a court order) recorded on September 17, 2025, in Case No. Crl.Mp.No.152/2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet. The witness, a 40-year-old Chief Manager from Vellore, provided testimony regarding a financial institution loan matter and submitted 17 documentary exhibits (including loan agreements, hypothecation documents, demand notices, and possession notices dated between 2008-2025) which were marked as evidence. The deposition was read over and admitted as correct by the deponent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (not a court order) recorded on September 17, 2025, in Case No. Crl.Mp.No.152/2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet. The witness, a 40-year-old Chief Manager from Vellore, provided testimony regarding a financial institution loan matter and submitted 17 documentary exhibits (including loan agreements, hypothecation documents, demand notices, and possession notices dated between 2008-2025) which were marked as evidence. The deposition was read over and admitted as correct by the deponent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts