INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs KARTHI ALIAS BANARJI — 168/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294b, 323, 324, 307 R/W 34. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP020000342025
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2019
Registration No
168/2019
Registration Date
03-12-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
FIR Details
FIR Number
0
Police Station
RANIPET
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Respondent(s)
KARTHI ALIAS BANARJI
NAVEEN ALIAS NAGARAJAN
VIJAYARAGAVAN ALIAS PINNAL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 07-04-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 24-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 18-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition document from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet (Case No. SC.No.168/2019), recorded on 19th August 2025. The witness (PW 9) testified regarding the seizure of two vehicles—a Royal Enfield motorcycle (TN 73 AA 3344) and an Apache motorcycle (TN 73 M 3344)—based on a confession statement dated 29.12.2018. The deposition documents the witness's account of the vehicle seizures, their photographic evidence, and includes cross-examination by the defense challenging the authenticity of the photographs and certain procedural details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition document from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ranipet (Case No. SC.No.168/2019), recorded on 19th August 2025. The witness (PW 9) testified regarding the seizure of two vehicles—a Royal Enfield motorcycle (TN 73 AA 3344) and an Apache motorcycle (TN 73 M 3344)—based on a confession statement dated 29.12.2018. The deposition documents the witness's account of the vehicle seizures, their photographic evidence, and includes cross-examination by the defense challenging the authenticity of the photographs and certain procedural details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts