VIJAYALAKSHMI vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER — 200040/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, RULE 14 A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP010020922024

Filing Number

200203/2024

Filing Date

21-Mar-2024

Registration No

200040/2024

Registration Date

21-Mar-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Ranipet

Judge

2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, RULE 14 A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYALAKSHMI

    Adv. SELVARAJ A G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

  2. 2.THE EXCUTIVE ENGINEER

  3. 3.ASSISTANT ENGINEER

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a witness deposition document (OS No. 40/2024-PW-1) recorded in the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet on 19.01.2026. The witness, Mrs. Vijayalakshmi (age 45), affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that the signatures and statements in the affidavit presented are her own and were prepared based on information she provided to her counsel. The document records her examination-in-chief but does not contain a substantive court order regarding bail, petition disposal, or case adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  9. 01-Dec-2025

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  15. 07-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  17. 25-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  18. 23-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  19. 24-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  20. 03-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  21. 03-Dec-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  22. 24-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  23. 19-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  24. 24-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  25. 11-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  26. 18-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  27. 22-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  28. 19-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

  29. 21-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 21-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200040/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition document (OS No. 40/2024-PW-1) recorded in the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet on 19.01.2026. The witness, Mrs. Vijayalakshmi (age 45), affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that the signatures and statements in the affidavit presented are her own and were prepared based on information she provided to her counsel. The document records her examination-in-chief but does not contain a substantive court order regarding bail, petition disposal, or case adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case