INSPECTOR OF POLICE, vs MANI. G Advocate - SELVARAJ A G — 18/2025
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 120(B),409,467,467,471,468,468,471,477-A,167, 13(2), 13(1)(c),109. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
SPLCC - Special Calendar Case
CNR: TNRP010019392025
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
1390/2025
Filing Date
15-04-2021
Registration No
18/2025
Registration Date
14-07-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
Respondent(s)
MANI. G Advocate - SELVARAJ A G
RAMALINGAM.M
BASKARAN.M
THIRUMAVALAVAN.R
VAJIRAM.G
SAMPATHRAJ .C
ROOBANKUMAR.G
RAJASEKAR.N
RAVIKUMAR.S
SRIRAMULU
PALANI .J
PERUMALSAMY.R
KUMARAGURU.N
RAMESH. R.A.
RAVI ALIAS RAVIKUMAR.N
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: This document is a witness deposition (PW-43) recorded on 19.02.2026 in SPLCC Case No. 18/2025 before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Ranipet. A 70-year-old retired government official testified regarding allegations of improper distribution of pump sets to farmers, with cross-examinations conducted by multiple defense counsels (defendants 3-15). The witness's testimony was admitted as correct and the deposition was formally certified by the Principal District and Sessions Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: This document is a witness deposition (PW-43) recorded on 19.02.2026 in SPLCC Case No. 18/2025 before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Ranipet. A 70-year-old retired government official testified regarding allegations of improper distribution of pump sets to farmers, with cross-examinations conducted by multiple defense counsels (defendants 3-15). The witness's testimony was admitted as correct and the deposition was formally certified by the Principal District and Sessions Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts