Ganesan vs The Inspector of Police Sipcot PS — 391/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP010008512026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

519/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

391/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ranipet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

SIPCOT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesan

    Adv. G ARUNACHALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police Sipcot PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Ranipet Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Ganesan in a family dispute case involving allegations of assault and threats under BNS sections 127(2), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Ranipet

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge, Ranipet

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Ranipet Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Ganesan in a family dispute case involving allegations of assault and threats under BNS sections 127(2), 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case