The Inspector of Police, Banavaram vs RAMAKRISHNAMOORTHI — 62/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366,363,376(2)(n). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.

SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case

CNR: TNRP010003862025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-02-2025

Filing Number

284/2025

Filing Date

10-02-2025

Registration No

62/2025

Registration Date

10-03-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Ranipet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

109

Police Station

BANAVARAM

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 366,363,376(2)(n)
PROTECTION OF CHILD FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 5(l),6(1)
PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT 2006 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police, Banavaram

Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

RAMAKRISHNAMOORTHI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Ranipet

08-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Judgement

17-03-2026

Questioning

13-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the 22-year-old defendant of all charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n), POCSO Act sections 5(1) r/w 6(1), and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act section 9. The judge found that while the prosecution alleged the defendant abducted and sexually assaulted a minor girl, then married her, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the girl was below 18 years old at the time of the alleged offenses—a critical element for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the 22-year-old defendant of all charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n), POCSO Act sections 5(1) r/w 6(1), and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act section 9. The judge found that while the prosecution alleged the defendant abducted and sexually assaulted a minor girl, then married her, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the girl was below 18 years old at the time of the alleged offenses—a critical element for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ranipet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case